Uncategorized

Gurdev Singh Bhalla Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No._______ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 11654/2023] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The challenge by means of this appeal is to an order dated 23rd March, 2023 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby

(2010) 8 SCC 452 KAPIL CO COREPACKS PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERSVERSUSHARBANS LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH URS Civil Appeal No. 6207 of 2010, decided on August 3, 2010 📌Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Or. 10 Rr. 2 & 1. Or. 12 R. 3-A and Or. 18 Rr. 4, 16 & 17 Examination under Or. 10 R. 2

Fali S Nariman writes: Where the Supreme Court went wrong on Article 370 Politically, it’s good that Article 370, a temporary provision, is gone. But the SC verdict lets Centre get away — with violating the Constitution and federal principles

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Air Commodore NK Sharma (17038) ADM/LGL. [Civil Appeal No. 14524 of 2015] Sanjay Karol J., 1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 31(1)1 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 20072 at the instance of the Union of India, is directed against the judgment and order dated 30th November 2015, passed

• Section 439 CRPC Offence under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA Act Prayer for bail Applicant and his family members and beneficial interest in various companies Applicant had allegedly hatched conspiracy with owners of DHFL for siphoning huge amount Though applicant was in custody for three years, involvement of public money showed that charge

Afjal Ansari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 3838 of 2023 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 11129 of 2023] Surya Kant, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.07.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), partially allowing the application filed by the