Uncategorized

KAVITHA Versus. C. PRABAKAR. C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012

1 (2013) DMC 116 (DB)MADRAS HIGH COURT R. KAVITHAversusC. PRABAKAR C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012 (i) Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Order 23 Rule 1(3)- Withdrawal of suit/petition with liberty to file fresh suit/petition on same cause of action- Court has to be satisfied about existence of formal defect as contemplated under Order 23 Rule […]

KAVITHA Versus. C. PRABAKAR. C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012 Read More »

Deep Trading Company vs. Indian Oil Corporation Citation:(2013) 4 SCC 35

S. 11(6) – Under what circumstances appointment of arbitrator by Chief Justice or designate can be made Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 makes provision for making an application to the Chief Justice concerned for appointment of an arbitrator in three circumstances: (a) a party fails to act as required under the

Deep Trading Company vs. Indian Oil Corporation Citation:(2013) 4 SCC 35 Read More »

Legal facts…

The Single Judge Bench comprising of Justice Jyotsna Sharma of the Allahabad High Court allowed a petition filed by Smt Zahida Anjum, seeking maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the CrPC. The Court observed that the husband had a burden to prove his claim of pronouncing triple talaq on the wife, and merely

Legal facts… Read More »

E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR Vs.M/S. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY LAB — Respondent. Civil Appeal No.3368 of 2012

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR Vs.M/S. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY LAB — Respondent Civil Appeal No.3368 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION:- 02-08-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 – Section 1(4) – A notification issued on 06.09.2007 by the Government of Kerala covering Medical institutions

E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR Vs.M/S. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY LAB — Respondent. Civil Appeal No.3368 of 2012 Read More »

STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE — Appellant Vs. S. SUBBEGOWDA — Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE — Appellant Vs. S. SUBBEGOWDA — Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023 DATE OF DECISION;- 03-08-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT A. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 13(1)(e), 13(2) and 19(3) – Corruption – Appeal against order of discharge on the ground

STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE — Appellant Vs. S. SUBBEGOWDA — Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023 Read More »

State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police Vs. S. Subbegowda[Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023]Bela M. Trivedi, J.1

State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police Vs. S. Subbegowda[Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023]Bela M. Trivedi, J.1. The appellant – State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police by way of instant appeal has assailed the judgment and order dated 16.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No. 4463 of 2018 whereby the High

State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police Vs. S. Subbegowda[Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023]Bela M. Trivedi, J.1 Read More »

Legal news…MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT AWARDED BECAUSE OF POLITICAL REASONS , NOT GRAVITY OF ALLEGATIONS…

MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT AWARDED BECAUSE OF POLITICAL REASONS , NOT GRAVITY OF ALLEGATIONS While defamation in India is quite a serious issue, the Supreme Court acknowledges ten exceptions to defamation, under which a person cannot be held guilty if the statement made by them falls in line with the right of freedom of speach. Defamation Law

Legal news…MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT AWARDED BECAUSE OF POLITICAL REASONS , NOT GRAVITY OF ALLEGATIONS… Read More »