Uncategorized

Interesting Judgement Briefing Case Title : A.K. Gopalan Case (1950) Judges : Judges sitting : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice), S. Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, B.K. Mukherjea, Sudhi Ranjan Das. Decision by : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice) Dissent : S. Fazl Ali. Facts :▪️In this case, the appellant, A K Gopalan, commonly […]

÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ ✴️सभी निवारक हिरासत कानून आवश्यक रूप से कठोर’: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत मामलों में प्रक्रिया के सख्त पालन पर जोर दिया ====+====+====+====+==== 🟣 झारखंड में निवारक हिरासत कानून के तहत एक व्यक्ति की निरंतर हिरासत के संबंध में दायर एक याचिका में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत कानूनों से संबंधित

Restoration Court shall not set aside the ex parte decree on mere irregularity in the service of summons in a case where the defendant otherwise, had notice of the date of hearing and sufficient time to appear in the court. An ex parte decree against a defendant has to be set aside if the party

AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2234 (From: Delhi) Civil Appeal No. 1893 of 2008 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 6892 of 2007),D.11-3-2008. Chander Kanta Bansal v. Rajinder Singh Anand. (A) Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), O. 6, R. 17, Proviso Amendment of pleadings Liberal principles guide exercise of discretion in allowing amendment But care

The Allahabad High Court has declined to grant maintenance to a woman who voluntarily left the matrimonial home. Justice Prashant Kumar’s bench, while hearing the case, said that it is clear from the provision of Section 125 (4) of CrPC that if a wife refuses to live with her husband, she has no right to

(LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F) Dishonestly issuing a cheque……… Judgments of Supreme Court of Pakistan on S.489-F PPC 2017 SCMR 1944 SUPREME-COURT S. 497(5)—Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F —Dishonestly issuing a cheque—Petition for cancellation of bail, dismissal of—Case had been instituted by the complainant after about three years, two

Dr. Jaya Thakur Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 456 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1271 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1274 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1272 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1307 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1330 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.

AIR 2000 BOMBAY 18 Chandrakant Bhogilal Gohil, v. Parushottam Mohanlal Makwana and others, Suit. No. 1873 of 1985, D/- 26-4-1999. (A) Limitation Act (36 of 1963), Art. 54 -Suit for specific performance-Limita- tion-Contract for sale of flat-Time not essence of contract- Payment in instal- ment paid till period of 3 years from date of contract-

S. Narahari & Ors. Vs. S.R. Kumar & Ors. [Civil Appeal No._ of 2023 SLP (Civil) No._ of 2023 Diary No. 23775 of 2022] Krishna Murari, J. In the said Will, among other things, it was stated that both the legatees were to enjoy the suit property during their entire lifetime, and thereafter, the same