Uncategorized

• Order 9, Rule 9 CPC Eviction petition Dismissal of Rent Application for non prosecution Earlier eviction petition was filed on the ground of personal necessity as well as arrears of rent but was dismissed for nonprosecution, whereas the subsequent petition was also filed on the same ground of personal necessity and arrears of rent […]

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF ORISSA Vs.LAXMI NARAYAN DAS (DEAD) THR. LRS AND OTHERS — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 8072 of 2010 Date of Decision;- 12-07-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT A. Concealment of material facts from Court – A litigant can be non-suited in case he is found guilty of concealing material

State of Orissa & Anr. Vs. Laxmi Narayan Das (D) through LRS. & ors. [Civil Appeal No. 8072 of 2010] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The order dated October 30, 2009 passed by the Orissa High Court in Writ Appeal No. 108/2009 is under challenge in the present appeal. Vide aforesaid order, the order passed by

𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙎𝙐𝙋𝙍𝙀𝙈𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙏 𝙊𝙁 𝙄𝙉𝘿𝙄𝘼 Mathew Alexander v. Mohammed Shafi and Anr Criminal Appeal No. 1931 of 2023 DATE OF DECISION:- 13-07-2023 HEADNOTE CRIMINAL LAWS / ACCIDENTAL CLAIM Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 – Quashing of charge-sheet – An FIR was filed by complainant under Sections 279 and 304A IPC stating that Appellant’s son

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Jagan Singh & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4335 of 2023] Abhay S. Oka, J. Interlocutory Application No. 37319 of 2022 1. We have recorded reasons for condoning the delay in the main judgment. Factual Aspects 2. The first respondent filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the

Will Propounder to explain suspicious circumstances surrounding a will. Mere proof of will not sufficient to accept a will. The suspicious circumstances may be as to the genuineness of the signatures of the testator, the condition of the testator’s mind, the disposition made in the will being unnatural, improper or unfair in the light of

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (2022) 4 Crimes 119 : (2022) 3 JCC 2100 : (2022) 10 SCALE 577 : (2022) 6 SCR 382 VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent SLP (Criminal) No. 4634 of 2014 with; SLP (Civil) No. 28394 of 2011; SLP (Civil) No.

×××××× Legal Update ×××××× ðŸ…¾️हिरासत में लिए गए व्यक्ति के खिलाफ कोई एफआईआर नहीं हुआ है, ऐसा लग रहा है कि रिकॉर्ड में हेरफेर किया गया: जम्मू-कश्मीर हाईकोर्ट ने प्रिवेंटिव डिटेंशन आदेश को रद्द किया ====+====+====+====+==== ⚫जम्मू-कश्मीर एंड लद्दाख हाईकोर्ट ने एक व्यक्ति के खिलाफ कोई एफआईआर न होने पर उसके खिलाफ पारित प्रिवेंटिव डिटेंशन

ILR 2015 KAR 2335 Smt. Krishnakumari vs. Sri K. Suresh Kumar * REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 – SECTION 17(1A) – Possession of immovable property under the agreement to be compulsorily registrable – HELD, By virtue of amendment to Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, whereby sub-Section (1A) has been incorporated, which would require any such

Restoration Court shall not set aside the ex parte decree on mere irregularity in the service of summons in a case where the defendant otherwise, had notice of the date of hearing and sufficient time to appear in the court. An ex parte decree against a defendant has to be set aside if the party