State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police Vs. S. Subbegowda[Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023]Bela M. Trivedi, J.1. Criminal Petition No. 4463 of 2018
State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police Vs. S. Subbegowda[Criminal Appeal No. 1598 of 2023]Bela M. Trivedi, J.1. The appellant – State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police by way of instant appeal has assailed the judgment and order dated 16.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No. 4463 of 2018 whereby the High
RANJANA KAMBLEversusRANJANA VIMALTAI & ORS. Civil Revision No. 25 of 2011-Decided on 17.4.2012
I (2013) DMC 229CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RANJANA KAMBLEversusRANJANA VIMALTAI & ORS. Civil Revision No. 25 of 2011-Decided on 17.4.2012 (i) Indian Succession Act, 1925- Sections 372, 384(3)- Succession Certificate Grant of Validity Unchastity of a wife is certainly a ground for divorce but in the absence of decree of divorce, cannot be pressed into service
The Credibility of Hostile Witnesses: Unraveling the Complexities of Testimony Introduction In a court of law, witness testimonies play a pivotal role in ascertaining the truth and ensuring justice is served. However, not all witnesses provide impartial and reliable accounts. Hostile witnesses, in particular, can present significant challenges to the credibility of their testimony.
PREET RANJAN KAUR Versus HARJIT SINGH & ANR. Amended Crl. WP No. 978 of 2012-Decided on 16.11.2012
I (2013) DMC 123 (DB)PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT PREET RANJAN KAURversusHARJIT SINGH & ANR. Amended Crl. WP No. 978 of 2012-Decided on 16.11.2012 (i) Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Section 6-Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 – Section 25 – Custody of Child Guardianship – Welfare of child is of utmost consideration – Child
KAVITHA Versus. C. PRABAKAR. C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012
1 (2013) DMC 116 (DB)MADRAS HIGH COURT R. KAVITHAversusC. PRABAKAR C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012 (i) Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Order 23 Rule 1(3)- Withdrawal of suit/petition with liberty to file fresh suit/petition on same cause of action- Court has to be satisfied about existence of formal defect as contemplated under Order 23 Rule
KAVITHA Versus. C. PRABAKAR. C.M.A. No. 2033 of 2010-Decided on 17.9.2012 Read More »
Deep Trading Company vs. Indian Oil Corporation Citation:(2013) 4 SCC 35
S. 11(6) – Under what circumstances appointment of arbitrator by Chief Justice or designate can be made Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 makes provision for making an application to the Chief Justice concerned for appointment of an arbitrator in three circumstances: (a) a party fails to act as required under the
Deep Trading Company vs. Indian Oil Corporation Citation:(2013) 4 SCC 35 Read More »
Legal facts…
The Single Judge Bench comprising of Justice Jyotsna Sharma of the Allahabad High Court allowed a petition filed by Smt Zahida Anjum, seeking maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the CrPC. The Court observed that the husband had a burden to prove his claim of pronouncing triple talaq on the wife, and merely
Case Law: Rajesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.
ð¹S. 17 (3) (b) and (c) – Arms licence – Cancellation of Ground for issue of show cause notice, that licence obtained by giving wrong address and several criminal case pending against him – Well settled law that mere involvement in criminal case is not the ground for cancellation of licence On perusal of show
Case Law: Rajesh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Read More »
