LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F
(((LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F))) Dishonestly issuing a cheque……… Judgments of Supreme Court of Pakistan on S.489-F PPC 2017 SCMR 1944 SUPREME-COURT S. 497(5)—Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F —Dishonestly issuing a cheque—Petition for cancellation of bail, dismissal of—Case had been instituted by the complainant after about three years, two
LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F Read More »
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation on 11.07.2022
Important Guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Landmark Judgement of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation on 11.07.2022 The courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Sections 41 and 41A of the Code. Any non-compliance would entitle the accused to grant bail i.e. if the police authorities
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation on 11.07.2022 Read More »
Case:Dilip Vs. Satish . AIROnline 2022 SC 1005
⭐ SC: Forged NOC to get electricity connection – Authorities failed to see if Applicant accused were in possession or not, HC overlooked the definition of cheating – HC order quashing the FIR is set aside. S.482-Quashing of FIR-Offence of cheating – Allegations that accused allegedly fabricated NO OBJECTION certificate for supply of electricity in
Case:Dilip Vs. Satish . AIROnline 2022 SC 1005 Read More »
Legal update
LEGAL UPDATE एनडीपीएस एक्ट की धारा 36A(4) – 180 दिनों की वैधानिक अवधि के बाद अभियुक्त की हिरासत के लिए लोक अभियोजक की रिपोर्ट अनिवार्य : पी एंड एच हाईकोर्ट ⚫ पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में माना कि नारकोटिक ड्रग्स एंड साइकोट्रॉपिक सबस्टेंस एक्ट, 1985 की धारा 36-ए (4) के अनुसार जांच
Law facts
↗️ðSPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963-Section 34 proviso suit for declaration-Maintainability-Court is barred from making declaration if plaintiff omits to seek further relief-Plaintiff not seeking relief of possession though had suffered a decree in earlier suit to the effect that he was not in possession of suit property Plaintiff also prohibited under Order 2. Rule 2(3) from
Law facts
↗️ðCIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908-Section 64, Order 38, Rule 11, 11A. Order 21, Rule 57-Attachment before judgment-Provisions applicable to attachment made in execution of decree Also applies to attachment before judgment-Subsequent passing of decree in favour of plaintiff Whether plaintiff has to file application for re- attachment of very same property in execution of decree-Order of
Anil vs Tara CWJ 1671/19 13/12/22 [ ANIL JJ ]
• Order 6, Rule 17 CPC Amendment of plaint Delay in bringing amendment is no ground to refuse amendment Suit challenging gift deed Proposed amendment is not changing nature of suit and is not introducing new case No prejudice shall be caused to petitioner if amendment is allowed for proper adjudication of case Proposed amendment
Anil vs Tara CWJ 1671/19 13/12/22 [ ANIL JJ ] Read More »
