admin_nupur

Right to defend oneself a fundamental right: Supreme Court rejects Bar Association’s proposal not to represent any party Case Title: Roopshree HR vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. The Supreme Court has quashed the resolution passed by the Mysore Bar Association in which it had resolved not to file Vakalatnama or appear on behalf of

Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain Vs. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 1480 of 2012]J.K. Maheshwari J.1. The instant appeal arises out of the judgment dated 04.07.2008, passed by the Division Bench of the ‘High Court of Judicature at Bombay’ in Appeal No. 63 of 2008, whereby the Division Bench dismissed the

AIR 2024 BOMBAY 21BOMBAY HIGH COURT(GOA BENCH) Ramanand Gunaji Amonkar and others v. Raghuvir Shamba Amonkar. Second Appeal 45 of 2010, D.6-11-2023. 📌Specific Relief Act (47 of 1963), S.38 Suit for permanent injunction Settled possession Concept of – Plaintiff’s case that he was put in possession of suit shop in pursuance of family settlement deed

SECTION 354 (3) OF Cr.PC. Death sentence– Conformation of — Rarest of rare cases. Conviction for rape and murder of minor– Accused committed brutal rape and murder of 8 year old girl child in hapless situation– Accused how ever had no criminal antecedents and hailed from poor socio-economic background– Unblemished conduct of accused inside jail

• Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) Eviction petition The petitioner challenges the order of the Rent Controller that dismissed his application to be impleaded as a party in an eviction petition filed by the respondent no.1, against the respondent no.2, who is the petitioner’s brother and one of the legal heirs of their deceased

• PC ACT Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) The complainant, had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court in 2005 alleging that he had recorded videos of police personnel taking bribe from bootleggers The court directed the Commissioner of Police to conduct an enquiry, and a chargesheet was filed against the nine police officers

(2016) 7 MLJ 355 (SC) Gulshera Khanam vs. Aftab Ahmad Date of Judgment :27.09.2016 📌Tenancy Laws – Bona Fide Requirement – Family – Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (Act 1972), Sections 3(g), 21 and 21(1)(a) – Constitution of India (Constitution), Article 227 – Appellant/landlady filed application under Section