admin_nupur

🔔 Daily News 🔔 📖

Joseph Vs. State of Kerala & Ors. [Writ Petition (Criminal) No(S). 520 of 2022] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner, currently serving a life imprisonment sentence for a crime committed in 1996, punishable under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter “IPC”) approaches this court seeking to enforce his right under

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Vs. Kishor Sharad Borawake and Ors. [Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19401 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19730 of 2019] B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present set of appeals challenge the common judgment and order passed by

Balwinder Singh (Binda) Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau [Criminal Appeal No. 1136 of 2014] Satnam Singh Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau [Criminal Appeal No. 1933 of 2014] Hima Kohli, J. 1. The present appeals arise from the common judgment dated 08th July, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and

• Order 6, Rule 17 CPC Disallowing application for amendment in prayer – Rejected on ground that application was moved on a later stage after the evidence was recorded by the petitioner – Amendment ought to have been allowed as the petitioner was although not entitled to be granted the letter of probate – Petitioner

IMPORTANT CASE LAWS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

🔔 Daily News 🔔 📖

Photo copy of a document is admissible as secondary evidence when compared with the original. On examination of the evidence, it is clear that the party had tendered the Agreement to Sell as an Exhibit after showing to the Trial Court original Agreement to Sell. ” It is also necessary to point out that the