admin_nupur

Designs Act. The plaintiff can claim copyright for a design only if the design is registered under the Designs Act. Since the alleged designs have not been registered under the designs At the plaintiffs cannot claim copyright therein. In view of the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000 and the Copyright Act, 1957 the plaintiffs […]

AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 4 Civil Appeal Nos. 115-116 of 2001, D.29- 9-2008. Ram Kumar & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(From: Rajasthan) (A) Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), S. 80- Non- service of notice under Effect -Land acquisition proceedings Transfer of land to plaintiff in lieu of his acquired land duly approved

Interesting Judgement Briefing Case Title : A.K. Gopalan Case (1950) Judges : Judges sitting : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice), S. Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, B.K. Mukherjea, Sudhi Ranjan Das. Decision by : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice) Dissent : S. Fazl Ali. Facts :▪️In this case, the appellant, A K Gopalan, commonly

÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ ✴️सभी निवारक हिरासत कानून आवश्यक रूप से कठोर’: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत मामलों में प्रक्रिया के सख्त पालन पर जोर दिया ====+====+====+====+==== 🟣 झारखंड में निवारक हिरासत कानून के तहत एक व्यक्ति की निरंतर हिरासत के संबंध में दायर एक याचिका में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत कानूनों से संबंधित

Restoration Court shall not set aside the ex parte decree on mere irregularity in the service of summons in a case where the defendant otherwise, had notice of the date of hearing and sufficient time to appear in the court. An ex parte decree against a defendant has to be set aside if the party

AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2234 (From: Delhi) Civil Appeal No. 1893 of 2008 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 6892 of 2007),D.11-3-2008. Chander Kanta Bansal v. Rajinder Singh Anand. (A) Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), O. 6, R. 17, Proviso Amendment of pleadings Liberal principles guide exercise of discretion in allowing amendment But care

The Allahabad High Court has declined to grant maintenance to a woman who voluntarily left the matrimonial home. Justice Prashant Kumar’s bench, while hearing the case, said that it is clear from the provision of Section 125 (4) of CrPC that if a wife refuses to live with her husband, she has no right to

(LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F) Dishonestly issuing a cheque……… Judgments of Supreme Court of Pakistan on S.489-F PPC 2017 SCMR 1944 SUPREME-COURT S. 497(5)—Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F —Dishonestly issuing a cheque—Petition for cancellation of bail, dismissal of—Case had been instituted by the complainant after about three years, two